feat(x/accounts)!: make address generation more robust and add predictable address creation #22776
Conversation
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant modifications to the account management system within the Cosmos SDK. A new field, Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
|
@testinginprod your pull request is missing a changelog! |
testinginprod
added
the
backport/v0.52.x
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (11)
tests/integration/accounts/base_account_test.go (2)
35-35: Consider adding test cases for non-nil address seed.The test only covers the case where
addressSeedis nil. Consider adding test cases with non-nil values to verify the predictable address creation functionality.
Line range hint
41-42: TODO comment needs addressing.The TODO comment indicates a potential issue with account existence checks in x/auth. This should be tracked and addressed.
Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track this TODO item?
x/accounts/genesis_test.go (1)
22-22: Consider consolidating duplicate Init calls.Both Init calls have identical parameters except for subsequent operations. Consider using a test helper function to reduce code duplication.
func initTestAccount(t *testing.T, k Keeper, ctx Context, sender []byte) ([]byte, error) { _, addr, err := k.Init(ctx, testAccountType, sender, &types.Empty{}, nil, nil) require.NoError(t, err) return addr, err }Also applies to: 28-28
tests/integration/accounts/lockup/permanent_lockup_test_suite.go (2)
33-33: Add test cases for address seed functionality.The test should include cases verifying that the permanent locking account works correctly with address seeds for predictable address creation.
Line range hint
42-55: Consider parameterizing error test cases.The error test cases could be structured as a table-driven test to make it easier to add more test cases in the future.
func TestErrorCases(t *testing.T) { testCases := []struct { name string msg sdk.Msg wantErr bool }{ { name: "wrong sender", msg: &types.MsgSend{ Sender: addr, ToAddress: addr, Amount: sdk.Coins{sdk.NewCoin("stake", math.NewInt(100))}, }, wantErr: true, }, // Add more test cases here } // ... test execution }tests/integration/auth/keeper/accounts_retro_compatibility_test.go (1)
135-138: Improve test documentation for account number expectationsThe test initializes two accounts but lacks clear documentation about the expected account numbers and why they start from a specific number.
Add a comment explaining:
- Why account numbers start from a specific value
- The relationship between account numbers and genesis accounts
x/accounts/proto/cosmos/accounts/v1/tx.proto (1)
42-44: Enhance address_seed field documentationWhile the current documentation explains the basic purpose, it should provide more details about:
- Expected format and constraints of the seed
- Security implications
- Whether the seed can be reused
Consider expanding the documentation to include:
// address_seed can be used to deterministically create the address of the account. // If not present the address will be generated based on its associated account number. + // The seed must be a unique value to prevent address collisions. + // Format: Raw bytes with recommended length of 32 bytes for security. + // Security: Seeds should be generated using a cryptographically secure random number generator.tests/integration/v2/auth/accounts_retro_compatibility_test.go (1)
102-102: Consider adding test cases for address generationSimilar to the v1 tests, this file should include test cases for the new address_seed functionality.
Consider adding test cases in a new test function
TestAccountAddressGenerationto verify:
- Deterministic address generation with seeds
- Default address generation behavior
- Address uniqueness guarantees
tests/integration/accounts/fixture_test.go (1)
188-188: Enhance test fixture to support address seed testing.The test fixture could be improved to support testing different address seed scenarios. Consider adding a parameter to
initFixturethat allows tests to specify different address seeds.-func initFixture(t *testing.T, f func(ctx context.Context, msg *account_abstractionv1.MsgAuthenticate) (*account_abstractionv1.MsgAuthenticateResponse, error)) *fixture { +func initFixture(t *testing.T, f func(ctx context.Context, msg *account_abstractionv1.MsgAuthenticate) (*account_abstractionv1.MsgAuthenticateResponse, error), addressSeed []byte) *fixture { // ... existing code ... - _, addr, err := accountsKeeper.Init(integrationApp.Context(), "mock", []byte("system"), &gogotypes.Empty{}, nil, nil) + _, addr, err := accountsKeeper.Init(integrationApp.Context(), "mock", []byte("system"), &gogotypes.Empty{}, nil, addressSeed)tests/integration/accounts/lockup/continous_lockup_test_suite.go (1)
37-37: Improve time-based test robustness.While the test covers time-based locking functionality, it uses real time (
time.Now()). Consider using a fixed timestamp to make tests more deterministic.- currentTime := time.Now() + currentTime := time.Date(2024, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, time.UTC)Additionally, consider adding test cases for address seed functionality to ensure predictable address generation works as expected.
x/accounts/README.md (1)
511-511: Add blank line before heading.According to markdown standards, headings should be surrounded by blank lines for better readability.
Apply this diff:
-### Method 1: Using Address Seeds + +### Method 1: Using Address Seeds🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
511-511: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
x/accounts/v1/tx.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
📒 Files selected for processing (17)
api/cosmos/accounts/v1/tx.pulsar.go(16 hunks)tests/integration/accounts/base_account_test.go(1 hunks)tests/integration/accounts/fixture_test.go(1 hunks)tests/integration/accounts/lockup/continous_lockup_test_suite.go(1 hunks)tests/integration/accounts/lockup/delayed_lockup_test_suite.go(1 hunks)tests/integration/accounts/lockup/periodic_lockup_test_suite.go(1 hunks)tests/integration/accounts/lockup/permanent_lockup_test_suite.go(1 hunks)tests/integration/accounts/multisig/test_suite.go(1 hunks)tests/integration/auth/keeper/accounts_retro_compatibility_test.go(2 hunks)tests/integration/v2/auth/accounts_retro_compatibility_test.go(2 hunks)x/accounts/README.md(1 hunks)x/accounts/errors.go(1 hunks)x/accounts/genesis_test.go(2 hunks)x/accounts/keeper.go(4 hunks)x/accounts/keeper_test.go(4 hunks)x/accounts/msg_server_test.go(1 hunks)x/accounts/proto/cosmos/accounts/v1/tx.proto(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (16)
x/accounts/errors.go (1)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
x/accounts/msg_server_test.go (2)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
tests/integration/accounts/fixture_test.go (3)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
tests/integration/accounts/multisig/test_suite.go (2)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
tests/integration/auth/keeper/accounts_retro_compatibility_test.go (3)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
x/accounts/README.md (1)
Pattern **/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"
tests/integration/accounts/lockup/periodic_lockup_test_suite.go (2)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
tests/integration/accounts/base_account_test.go (3)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
x/accounts/genesis_test.go (2)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
tests/integration/v2/auth/accounts_retro_compatibility_test.go (3)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
tests/integration/accounts/lockup/delayed_lockup_test_suite.go (2)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
tests/integration/accounts/lockup/continous_lockup_test_suite.go (2)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
x/accounts/keeper_test.go (2)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
api/cosmos/accounts/v1/tx.pulsar.go (1)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
x/accounts/keeper.go (1)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
tests/integration/accounts/lockup/permanent_lockup_test_suite.go (2)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
x/accounts/README.md
511-511: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
514-514: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
🔇 Additional comments (17)
x/accounts/keeper.go (4)
159-159: Proper error handling after calling makeAddress
Good job handling the error returned by makeAddress. This ensures robust error handling in the account initialization process.
184-184: Consistent use of AddressSeed in initFromMsg
Passing initMsg.AddressSeed to the Init method maintains consistency in address generation and ensures that the seed is utilized properly.
203-210: Prevent re-initialization of existing accounts
The added existence check for accounts effectively prevents initializing an account that already exists, improving the robustness of the account management.
320-339: Verify the security of the new address generation logic
The makeAddress function now incorporates creator, accNum, and addressSeed to generate addresses. Ensure that this method securely prevents address collisions and squatting.
Run the following script to check for address collisions with different addressSeed values:
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the code further by checking for any existing test cases or similar address generation implementations.
Let me check the implementation details and any related tests specifically in the accounts module.
Let me check for any existing tests or implementations specifically related to address generation and collision prevention.
Based on the code analysis, I can now provide a final response about the security of the address generation logic.
Address generation implementation is secure against collisions and squatting
The makeAddress implementation provides strong security guarantees through:
- Unique address derivation by combining creator address with either:
- A unique account number (auto-incrementing)
- Or a custom address seed
- Front-running prevention by incorporating the creator's address
- Collision prevention through SHA-256 hashing of the combined
ModuleName + creator + seedcomponents
The implementation ensures that:
- Each address is unique due to the incrementing account number
- Only the creator can generate a specific address
- Even with custom address seeds, the creator's address is still required
- The 256-bit hash space makes collisions cryptographically improbable
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that different address seeds produce unique addresses.
# Simulate address generation with different seeds.
seeds=("seed1" "seed2" "seed3")
creator="creator_address_in_hex"
addresses=()
for seed in "${seeds[@]}"; do
# Replace this with the actual address generation logic or a call to the relevant function.
addr=$(echo -n "${ModuleName}${creator}${seed}" | sha256sum | awk '{print $1}')
addresses+=("$addr")
done
# Check for duplicates.
if [ "$(printf '%s\n' "${addresses[@]}" | sort | uniq -d)" ]; then
echo "Address collision detected."
else
echo "No address collisions detected."
fi
Length of output: 908
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for test cases related to makeAddress function
rg -A 5 "TestMakeAddress|makeAddress.*test"
# Look for similar address generation patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'sha256.Sum256($$$)'
# Search for any existing address collision tests
rg -i "collision.*test|duplicate.*address"
Length of output: 2698
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for tests in the accounts module
rg -A 10 "func.*Test" x/accounts/
# Look for any existing address generation or validation logic
rg -A 5 "address.*generation|validate.*address" x/accounts/
# Check for any existing account creation tests
fd -t f "test" x/accounts/ --exec cat {}
Length of output: 66018
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for tests related to makeAddress function
rg -A 10 "makeAddress|TestMakeAddress" x/accounts/
# Search for any address collision prevention logic
rg -A 5 "collision|duplicate.*address" x/accounts/keeper/
# Check for any address validation tests
fd -t f "test" x/accounts/keeper/ --exec cat {}
Length of output: 2866
x/accounts/errors.go (1)
13-14: Addition of ErrAccountAlreadyExists improves error handling
Defining ErrAccountAlreadyExists provides a clear and specific error when an account initialization is attempted on an existing account.
x/accounts/msg_server_test.go (4)
27-27: Include AddressSeed in MsgInit for deterministic addresses
Adding AddressSeed to the MsgInit message allows testing of deterministic address creation, enhancing test coverage.
32-47: Add subtest to verify successful execution
The "success" subtest effectively verifies that the Execute method works as expected, enhancing the reliability of the tests.
49-57: Test handling of duplicate account initialization
The test correctly checks that initializing an account with the same AddressSeed results in ErrAccountAlreadyExists, ensuring proper error handling.
59-65: Ensure account can be initialized without AddressSeed
Testing initialization without an AddressSeed confirms that the system supports accounts without a seed, maintaining flexibility.
x/accounts/keeper_test.go (1)
20-20: Update tests to match the new Init method signature
The test cases have been appropriately updated with the additional nil parameter in the Init method calls, ensuring compatibility with the updated method signature.
Also applies to: 37-37, 47-47, 73-73
tests/integration/accounts/multisig/test_suite.go (1)
88-88: Modify initAccount to include the new parameter
Adding nil as the additional argument in the Init method call aligns with the updated method signature, keeping the integration tests consistent.
tests/integration/auth/keeper/accounts_retro_compatibility_test.go (1)
77-77: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add test cases for address_seed parameter
The Init call has been updated to include the new address_seed parameter, but there are no test cases verifying the deterministic address generation functionality.
Consider adding test cases to verify:
- Address generation with address_seed
- Address generation without address_seed (default behavior)
- Address collision prevention
tests/integration/v2/auth/accounts_retro_compatibility_test.go (1)
162-165: LGTM! Well-documented test expectations
The test clearly documents the account number expectations and explains the relationship with genesis accounts. This is a good example of clear test documentation.
tests/integration/accounts/lockup/delayed_lockup_test_suite.go (1)
36-36: Consider adding test cases for the new parameter.
While the nil parameter has been added to the Init call, there are no test cases verifying its behavior or impact on address generation.
tests/integration/accounts/lockup/periodic_lockup_test_suite.go (1)
49-49: LGTM! Verify the impact of the Init method signature change.
The addition of the nil parameter aligns with the updated Init method signature that now supports address seeds. The nil value indicates that the test is using the default address generation method.
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate additional verification to check the Init method signature in the codebase.
Let me try a different approach to find the Init method definition.
Let me try one more search to find the Init method in the accounts module.
All Init method calls have been properly updated with the address seed parameter
Based on the search results, I can verify that all Init method calls in the test files have been updated to include the new address seed parameter. The keeper's Init method signature in x/accounts/keeper.go shows it accepts the address seed parameter, and all test files are calling it with the correct number of arguments, including the nil value for the address seed when not specifying a custom seed.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all Init method calls in test files have been updated with the new parameter
# Test: Search for Init method calls in test files to ensure consistent updates
rg -A 2 "Init\(" "tests/integration/accounts/"
Length of output: 2669
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the Init method definition to verify its signature
ast-grep --pattern 'func $_($_ Keeper) Init($$$) ($_, $_, error) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 77
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the Init method definition using ripgrep
rg -A 5 "^func.*Init.*Keeper"
Length of output: 2224
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Init method in the accounts module
rg -A 5 "func.*Init" "x/accounts/"
Length of output: 77246
x/accounts/README.md (1)
499-524: LGTM! Clear and comprehensive documentation of address derivation methods.
The documentation clearly explains both address derivation methods and provides important best practices for using address seeds. The implementation details and security considerations are well documented.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
511-511: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
514-514: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
api/cosmos/accounts/v1/tx.pulsar.go (1)
4328-4330: LGTM! Generated protobuf code for address seed field.
The generated code properly implements the new address_seed field in the MsgInit message, with appropriate type and documentation.
| addressSeed []byte, | ||
| ) (transaction.Msg, []byte, error) { | ||
| // get the next account number | ||
| num, err := k.AccountNumber.Next(ctx) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Update function comment to include the new addressSeed parameter
The comment for the Init function should be updated to describe the purpose and usage of the addressSeed parameter, following Go documentation guidelines for exported functions.
| @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ func TestGenesis(t *testing.T) { | |||
| require.Equal(t, &types.UInt64Value{Value: 20}, resp) | |||
|
|
|||
| // check initted on genesis account | |||
| addr3, err := k.makeAddress(2) | |||
| addr3, err := k.makeAddress([]byte("sender-2"), 2, nil) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Add test cases for address generation with non-nil seeds
Based on the implementation in keeper.go, the makeAddress function supports two modes of address generation:
- Using creator and account number (current test coverage)
- Using creator and addressSeed (untested)
Add test cases to verify the deterministic address creation with non-nil seeds to ensure both code paths work as expected.
Example locations that need attention:
x/accounts/genesis_test.go: Add test cases with non-nil addressSeed parameter
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify address generation with non-nil seed.
The test only covers address generation with nil seed. Consider adding test cases with non-nil seeds to verify deterministic address creation.
Let me check the implementation of makeAddress to better understand the address generation logic.
Let me try to find the implementation using ripgrep instead.
Let me check all test files to see if there are any tests using non-nil addressSeed.
Let me try one more search with a different approach.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any tests covering non-nil address seeds
rg -l "makeAddress.*nil" | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
rg "makeAddress.*[^n][^i][^l]" "$file" || echo "No non-nil seed tests found"
done
Length of output: 252
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find the implementation of makeAddress function
ast-grep --pattern 'func $_ makeAddress($$$) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 57
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find the implementation of makeAddress function
rg -A 10 "func.*makeAddress"
Length of output: 733
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for makeAddress calls in test files
fd -e test.go --exec rg -B2 -A2 "makeAddress.*\(" {} \;
Length of output: 60
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for all makeAddress calls in the codebase
rg -B2 -A2 "makeAddress\("
Length of output: 1070
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
tests/integration/accounts/base_account_test.go (1)
35-35: Document the new nil parameter's purposeThe additional nil parameter represents the address_seed option. Consider adding a comment explaining its purpose for better test clarity.
tests/integration/accounts/lockup/permanent_lockup_test_suite.go (1)
33-33: Add test cases for address seed with lockup accountsThe test suite should include cases verifying address generation behavior with different address seeds for lockup accounts. This is particularly important as lockup accounts may have special requirements for address determinism.
Consider adding the following test cases:
- Initialize with specific address seed
- Verify address consistency when using the same seed
- Verify address uniqueness with different seeds
tests/integration/auth/keeper/accounts_retro_compatibility_test.go (2)
77-77: Consider adding test cases for address_seed parameterWhile the current test verifies backward compatibility with nil address_seed, it would be valuable to add test cases that verify the deterministic address generation behavior with non-nil address_seed values.
135-138: Add comment explaining the account number expectationsThe test initializes two accounts, but the comment about account numbers starting at 4 is only present in the v2 test file. Consider adding a similar explanatory comment here for maintainability.
- _, _, err = f.accountsKeeper.Init(f.app.Context(), "base", []byte("me"), &basev1.MsgInit{PubKey: anyPk}, nil, nil) - require.NoError(t, err) - - _, addr, err := f.accountsKeeper.Init(f.app.Context(), "base", []byte("me"), &basev1.MsgInit{PubKey: anyPk}, nil, nil) + // Account number should start with 1 since we're initializing the first account + _, _, err = f.accountsKeeper.Init(f.app.Context(), "base", []byte("me"), &basev1.MsgInit{PubKey: anyPk}, nil, nil) + require.NoError(t, err) + + // Second account should have account number 2 + _, addr, err := f.accountsKeeper.Init(f.app.Context(), "base", []byte("me"), &basev1.MsgInit{PubKey: anyPk}, nil, nil)tests/integration/v2/auth/accounts_retro_compatibility_test.go (1)
102-102: LGTM! Consider adding address_seed test casesSimilar to the v1 test file, consider adding test cases that verify deterministic address generation with non-nil address_seed values.
tests/integration/accounts/lockup/delayed_lockup_test_suite.go (1)
36-36: Document the purpose of the new nil parameterThe addition of a nil parameter to the Init call suggests support for optional configuration. Consider adding a comment explaining its purpose and potential future use.
tests/integration/accounts/fixture_test.go (1)
188-188: Consider adding error validation for the Init parametersWhile the nil parameter addition maintains consistency, consider adding validation for future non-nil parameters to ensure robust error handling in the test fixture.
tests/integration/accounts/lockup/continous_lockup_test_suite.go (1)
37-37: Consider adding edge case tests for time boundariesWhile the test coverage is good, consider adding edge cases for time boundaries (e.g., exactly at start time, one second before end time) to ensure robust handling of the continuous locking mechanism.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
x/accounts/v1/tx.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
📒 Files selected for processing (17)
api/cosmos/accounts/v1/tx.pulsar.go(16 hunks)tests/integration/accounts/base_account_test.go(1 hunks)tests/integration/accounts/fixture_test.go(1 hunks)tests/integration/accounts/lockup/continous_lockup_test_suite.go(1 hunks)tests/integration/accounts/lockup/delayed_lockup_test_suite.go(1 hunks)tests/integration/accounts/lockup/periodic_lockup_test_suite.go(1 hunks)tests/integration/accounts/lockup/permanent_lockup_test_suite.go(1 hunks)tests/integration/accounts/multisig/test_suite.go(1 hunks)tests/integration/auth/keeper/accounts_retro_compatibility_test.go(2 hunks)tests/integration/v2/auth/accounts_retro_compatibility_test.go(2 hunks)x/accounts/README.md(1 hunks)x/accounts/errors.go(1 hunks)x/accounts/genesis_test.go(2 hunks)x/accounts/keeper.go(4 hunks)x/accounts/keeper_test.go(4 hunks)x/accounts/msg_server_test.go(1 hunks)x/accounts/proto/cosmos/accounts/v1/tx.proto(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (16)
x/accounts/errors.go (1)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
tests/integration/accounts/lockup/permanent_lockup_test_suite.go (2)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
x/accounts/msg_server_test.go (2)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
tests/integration/accounts/lockup/continous_lockup_test_suite.go (2)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
tests/integration/accounts/fixture_test.go (3)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
x/accounts/keeper_test.go (2)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
tests/integration/accounts/base_account_test.go (3)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
tests/integration/accounts/lockup/periodic_lockup_test_suite.go (2)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
tests/integration/v2/auth/accounts_retro_compatibility_test.go (3)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
tests/integration/auth/keeper/accounts_retro_compatibility_test.go (3)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
tests/integration/accounts/lockup/delayed_lockup_test_suite.go (2)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
tests/integration/accounts/multisig/test_suite.go (2)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
x/accounts/genesis_test.go (2)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
x/accounts/README.md (1)
Pattern **/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"
x/accounts/keeper.go (1)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
api/cosmos/accounts/v1/tx.pulsar.go (1)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
x/accounts/README.md
511-511: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
514-514: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
🔇 Additional comments (23)
x/accounts/keeper.go (5)
151-151: Addition of 'addressSeed' parameter to 'Init' enhances functionality
The introduction of the addressSeed []byte parameter in the Init function allows for more robust and predictable address creation, aligning with the PR objectives.
159-159: Passing 'addressSeed' to 'makeAddress' ensures consistent address generation
Updating the call to k.makeAddress to include addressSeed correctly propagates the seed value for address creation.
184-184: Correctly forwarding 'AddressSeed' in 'initFromMsg'
The Init method within initFromMsg now properly includes initMsg.AddressSeed, ensuring that the seed is used during account initialization.
203-211: Proper handling of duplicate account initialization
The addition of the account existence check prevents duplicate accounts by returning ErrAccountAlreadyExists if the account already exists. This improves error handling and system robustness.
320-339: Address generation logic in 'makeAddress' is secure and robust
The makeAddress function correctly incorporates both creator and addressSeed to generate a unique address using SHA-256. This approach mitigates address squatting and ensures predictability when addressSeed is provided.
x/accounts/errors.go (1)
13-14: Definition of 'ErrAccountAlreadyExists' aligns with error handling practices
Adding ErrAccountAlreadyExists with an appropriate error code and message conforms to the existing error pattern and aids in clear error communication.
x/accounts/msg_server_test.go (4)
27-27: Inclusion of 'AddressSeed' in test initialization reflects new functionality
The test case now includes the AddressSeed parameter, properly testing the new address generation feature.
32-47: 'success' subtest effectively verifies account initialization and execution
Organizing the test into a subtest improves clarity, and the execution logic correctly tests the account's ability to handle messages after initialization.
49-57: Duplicate account initialization test ensures error is correctly returned
The new subtest checks that initializing an account with the same AddressSeed leads to ErrAccountAlreadyExists, validating the duplicate prevention logic.
59-65: Test confirms successful initialization without an 'AddressSeed'
By testing initialization without providing an AddressSeed, this subtest verifies that the seed is truly optional and that the default behavior remains functional.
x/accounts/keeper_test.go (4)
20-20: Tests updated to match new 'Init' method signature
Including nil as the additional parameter ensures that the tests align with the updated Init function, maintaining test integrity.
37-37: 'unknown account type' test correctly adapts to signature change
The test appropriately reflects the method signature update, continuing to validate error handling for invalid account types.
47-47: Account initialization in 'TestKeeper_Execute' updated properly
The addition of nil aligns the test with the new Init method parameters, ensuring accurate testing of account execution.
73-73: 'TestKeeper_Query' initialization updated to include new parameter
The test setup now correctly includes the additional nil parameter, keeping the query tests consistent with the updated method signature.
tests/integration/accounts/multisig/test_suite.go (1)
88-88: Multisig account initialization updated to include 'addressSeed' parameter
The initAccount function now passes nil for the addressSeed, ensuring compatibility with the updated Init method and maintaining the existing test behavior.
x/accounts/genesis_test.go (2)
22-22: Consider testing with non-nil address seed
Both Init calls use nil for the address seed. Consider adding test cases with specific address seeds to verify deterministic address generation.
Also applies to: 28-28
65-65: Verify makeAddress behavior with different seeds
The makeAddress call includes new parameters for sender and seed. Consider adding test cases to verify address uniqueness with different combinations of sender and seed values.
x/accounts/proto/cosmos/accounts/v1/tx.proto (1)
42-44: LGTM! Well-documented field addition
The new address_seed field is properly documented and follows protobuf best practices. The documentation clearly explains both the purpose and the default behavior.
tests/integration/v2/auth/accounts_retro_compatibility_test.go (1)
162-165: LGTM! Well-documented account initialization
The comment clearly explains the expected account numbers and why they start at 4 (due to fee_collector, bonded_tokens_pool, not_bonded_tokens_pool, and one genesis account).
tests/integration/accounts/lockup/continous_lockup_test_suite.go (1)
Line range hint 1-200: Verify consistent behavior across all account types
The changes to the Init method signature should be verified across all account types to ensure consistent behavior.
tests/integration/accounts/lockup/periodic_lockup_test_suite.go (1)
49-49: LGTM! Test coverage maintained with signature update.
The addition of the nil parameter to the Init method call correctly adapts the test to the new method signature that supports optional address seeds, while preserving the original test coverage.
✅ Verification successful
Test coverage maintained with signature update
The verification confirms that the Init method call in the test correctly adapts to the new method signature by passing nil as the AddressSeed parameter. The test maintains proper coverage of the periodic locking account initialization by providing all required parameters:
- Owner address
- Start time
- Locking periods
- Initial funds (1500 stake)
- Address seed (nil)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify test coverage for the Init method with address seed parameter
ast-grep --pattern 'Init($_, $_, $_, $_, $_)'
Length of output: 47
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check the Init method signature and its usages
rg "Init.*\(" --type go -A 2
Length of output: 68758
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the Init method implementation in the lockup test suite
rg -A 5 "Init.*\(" tests/integration/accounts/lockup/periodic_lockup_test_suite.go
Length of output: 383
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the MsgInitPeriodicLockingAccount type definition to understand its parameters
rg -A 10 "type MsgInitPeriodicLockingAccount struct" -g "*.go"
Length of output: 2300
x/accounts/README.md (1)
499-524: Documentation is comprehensive but needs formatting fixes.
The content clearly explains address derivation methods and best practices. However, the markdown headings should be surrounded by blank lines for better readability.
Apply these formatting changes:
## Address Derivation
+
The x/accounts module offers two methods for deriving addresses...
+
### Method 1: Using Address Seeds
+
When creating an account via `MsgInit`...
+
### Method 2: Using Account Numbers
+
If no address seed is provided...
+
### Address Seed Best Practices
+
1. Address seeds must be unique per creator...✅ Verification successful
Documentation matches implementation, but formatting changes are needed.
The address derivation implementation in x/accounts/keeper.go matches the documented behavior:
- For address seed method:
seed = append(creator, addressSeed...)
moduleAndSeed := append([]byte(ModuleName), seed...)
addr := sha256.Sum256(moduleAndSeed)- For account number method:
seed = append(creator, binary.BigEndian.AppendUint64(nil, accNum)...)
moduleAndSeed := append([]byte(ModuleName), seed...)
addr := sha256.Sum256(moduleAndSeed)The suggested markdown formatting changes will improve readability.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify that the documented address derivation matches implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'func makeAddress($creator, $seed) {
$$$
sha256($$$)
$$$
}'
Length of output: 86
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for address derivation implementation using ripgrep
rg -A 10 "func.*[Mm]akeAddress|func.*[Dd]eriveAddress" --type go
# Also search for any SHA256 related code
rg -A 5 "sha256|SHA256" --type go
Length of output: 54917
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
511-511: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
514-514: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
api/cosmos/accounts/v1/tx.pulsar.go (1)
Line range hint 77-87: LGTM! Generated protobuf code looks correct.
The protobuf code generation for the new address_seed field appears to be complete and correct, with all necessary methods and field descriptors properly generated.
Also applies to: 179-184, 208-209, 234-235, 267-269, 300-301, 337-338, 362-363, 4328-4330, 4381-4386
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the protobuf definitions to verify field numbers.
Let me try to find the proto file first.
Protobuf field generation for address_seed is correctly implemented
The generated code in tx.pulsar.go correctly reflects the protobuf definition in tx.proto. The address_seed field is properly defined as field number 5 in the proto file and is correctly included in the generated field descriptors, maintaining proper field ordering and compatibility.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify protobuf field numbers are sequential and there are no conflicts
rg -A 1 'fd_MsgInit_[a-z_]+ =' | sort
Length of output: 1551
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the proto file for field numbers and definitions
rg -A 10 'message MsgInit' api/cosmos/accounts/v1/tx.proto
Length of output: 132
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find the proto file containing MsgInit message
fd -e proto -x rg -l 'message MsgInit'
Length of output: 421
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the main tx.proto file for MsgInit field definitions
rg -A 10 'message MsgInit' ./x/accounts/proto/cosmos/accounts/v1/tx.proto
Length of output: 919
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the full MsgInit message definition to see all fields including address_seed
rg -B 5 -A 15 'message MsgInit' ./x/accounts/proto/cosmos/accounts/v1/tx.proto
Length of output: 1778
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
x/accounts/keeper.go (2)
151-151: Add documentation for the newaddressSeedparameter inInit.The
Initmethod now includes theaddressSeedparameter, but the method's documentation doesn't mention it. Updating the documentation will improve clarity for other developers using this method.
320-339: Clarify the address generation logic inmakeAddress.While the
makeAddressfunction effectively generates addresses using thecreator,addressSeed, andModuleName, adding comments to explain how this helps prevent address squatting and ensures predictability would enhance code readability and maintainability.x/accounts/msg_server_test.go (1)
32-32: Use descriptive names for test cases.Consider renaming the sub-test "success" to something more descriptive like "execute message successfully" to improve test readability.
x/accounts/keeper_test.go (1)
20-22: Improve readability when passing multiplenilparameters.Passing multiple
nilparameters to theInitfunction can make the code less readable. Consider assigning thesenilvalues to variables with descriptive names to clarify their purpose in the function call.Also applies to: 37-38, 47-49, 73-75
tests/integration/accounts/multisig/test_suite.go (1)
88-88: Ensure clarity when passingnilparameters in function calls.In the
initAccountmethod, passingnildirectly as an argument tos.app.AccountsKeeper.Initmay reduce code clarity. Consider using a named variable or adding a comment to explain what thenilrepresents.tests/integration/accounts/lockup/permanent_lockup_test_suite.go (1)
32-34: Consider security implications of predictable addressesThe combination of lockup accounts and predictable address generation requires careful consideration of potential security implications.
Recommendations:
- Document the interaction between address prediction and lockup mechanics
- Consider rate limiting or additional validation for address generation
- Add checks to prevent address grinding attacks
tests/integration/auth/keeper/accounts_retro_compatibility_test.go (1)
135-138: Update comment accuracy regarding account numbersThe test initializes two accounts, but the comment about account numbers could be more precise.
Consider updating the comment to:
- // we init two accounts to have account num not be zero. + // Initialize two accounts. The second account will have account number 1 + // as it's created after the first account.tests/integration/v2/auth/accounts_retro_compatibility_test.go (1)
162-165: Enhance account number documentationWhile the comment about account numbers is more detailed than in v1, it could be even clearer.
Consider updating the comment to:
- // we init two accounts. Account number should start with 4 - // since the first three accounts are fee_collector, bonded_tokens_pool, not_bonded_tokens_pool - // generated by init genesis plus one more genesis account, which make the current account number 4. + // Initialize two accounts sequentially. Account numbers will be 4 and 5 because: + // 1. Three system accounts (fee_collector, bonded_tokens_pool, not_bonded_tokens_pool) are created at genesis + // 2. One additional genesis account exists + // Therefore, the first account created here will be #4, and the second will be #5tests/integration/accounts/lockup/delayed_lockup_test_suite.go (1)
36-36: LGTM! Consider documenting the nil parameter.The addition of the nil parameter aligns with the new address generation feature. Consider adding a comment explaining that this parameter is for address_seed to improve code readability.
- }, sdk.Coins{sdk.NewCoin("stake", math.NewInt(1000))}, nil) + }, sdk.Coins{sdk.NewCoin("stake", math.NewInt(1000))}, nil /* address_seed */)tests/integration/accounts/lockup/continous_lockup_test_suite.go (1)
37-37: LGTM! Consider documenting the nil parameter.The addition of the nil parameter aligns with the new address generation feature. Consider adding a comment explaining that this parameter is for address_seed to improve code readability.
- }, sdk.Coins{sdk.NewCoin("stake", math.NewInt(1000))}, nil) + }, sdk.Coins{sdk.NewCoin("stake", math.NewInt(1000))}, nil /* address_seed */)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
x/accounts/v1/tx.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
📒 Files selected for processing (17)
api/cosmos/accounts/v1/tx.pulsar.go(16 hunks)tests/integration/accounts/base_account_test.go(1 hunks)tests/integration/accounts/fixture_test.go(1 hunks)tests/integration/accounts/lockup/continous_lockup_test_suite.go(1 hunks)tests/integration/accounts/lockup/delayed_lockup_test_suite.go(1 hunks)tests/integration/accounts/lockup/periodic_lockup_test_suite.go(1 hunks)tests/integration/accounts/lockup/permanent_lockup_test_suite.go(1 hunks)tests/integration/accounts/multisig/test_suite.go(1 hunks)tests/integration/auth/keeper/accounts_retro_compatibility_test.go(2 hunks)tests/integration/v2/auth/accounts_retro_compatibility_test.go(2 hunks)x/accounts/README.md(1 hunks)x/accounts/errors.go(1 hunks)x/accounts/genesis_test.go(2 hunks)x/accounts/keeper.go(4 hunks)x/accounts/keeper_test.go(4 hunks)x/accounts/msg_server_test.go(1 hunks)x/accounts/proto/cosmos/accounts/v1/tx.proto(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (16)
x/accounts/errors.go (1)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
tests/integration/accounts/multisig/test_suite.go (2)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
tests/integration/accounts/fixture_test.go (3)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
x/accounts/msg_server_test.go (2)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
tests/integration/auth/keeper/accounts_retro_compatibility_test.go (3)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
x/accounts/README.md (1)
Pattern **/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"
x/accounts/genesis_test.go (2)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
x/accounts/keeper_test.go (2)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
tests/integration/accounts/lockup/periodic_lockup_test_suite.go (2)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
tests/integration/accounts/base_account_test.go (3)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
tests/integration/v2/auth/accounts_retro_compatibility_test.go (3)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
tests/integration/accounts/lockup/permanent_lockup_test_suite.go (2)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
tests/integration/accounts/lockup/continous_lockup_test_suite.go (2)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
api/cosmos/accounts/v1/tx.pulsar.go (1)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
tests/integration/accounts/lockup/delayed_lockup_test_suite.go (2)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
x/accounts/keeper.go (1)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
x/accounts/README.md
511-511: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
514-514: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
x/accounts/errors.go (1)
13-14: LGTM!
The new error ErrAccountAlreadyExists is appropriately defined and enhances error handling for account initialization.
x/accounts/msg_server_test.go (1)
27-65: Good test coverage for the new AddressSeed functionality.
The added tests in TestMsgServer sufficiently cover the new scenarios related to AddressSeed, including successful initialization, handling duplicate initializations, and initialization without a seed.
tests/integration/accounts/base_account_test.go (1)
35-35: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add test cases for address generation feature
While the nil parameter has been added for the new address generation feature, there are no test cases validating the behavior with non-nil address seeds.
Consider adding test cases to validate:
- Address generation with specific seeds
- Address collision prevention
- Deterministic address creation
x/accounts/genesis_test.go (1)
65-65: Verify address generation determinism in genesis
The new address generation parameters in makeAddress should be tested for determinism across genesis export and import cycles.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the address generation tests.
Let me check the keeper implementation to understand the address generation logic.
Address generation determinism is properly implemented and tested
The genesis test already verifies address determinism by:
- Exporting and importing state with multiple accounts
- Verifying that
addr3generated withmakeAddressmatches the imported genesis account - Confirming the account state is preserved across export/import cycles
The makeAddress implementation ensures deterministic address generation by:
- Using a consistent seed generation from creator and account number when no address seed is provided
- Using creator + address seed when a custom seed is provided
- Prefixing with module name for namespace isolation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any existing determinism tests
rg -A 5 "deterministic.*address"
Length of output: 4302
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the genesis test implementation
cat x/accounts/genesis_test.go
# Check the makeAddress implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'func $_ makeAddress($$$) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 4357
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the keeper implementation for makeAddress
rg -A 10 "func.*makeAddress" x/accounts/keeper.go
Length of output: 523
tests/integration/accounts/lockup/permanent_lockup_test_suite.go (1)
33-33: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Verify address generation for specialized account types
The lockup account initialization should be tested with address seeds to ensure compatibility with the new address generation mechanism.
Add test cases to verify:
- Address generation with seeds for locked accounts
- Address uniqueness across different lockup types
- Deterministic address creation for specialized accounts
tests/integration/auth/keeper/accounts_retro_compatibility_test.go (1)
77-77: LGTM: Init method signature updated correctly
The additional nil parameter for address_seed is properly added, maintaining backward compatibility while supporting the new address generation feature.
x/accounts/proto/cosmos/accounts/v1/tx.proto (1)
42-44: LGTM: Well-documented address_seed field addition
The new field is properly documented and follows proto3 conventions. The comment clearly explains both the purpose and the fallback behavior.
tests/integration/v2/auth/accounts_retro_compatibility_test.go (1)
102-102: LGTM: Init method signature updated correctly
The additional nil parameter for address_seed is properly added, maintaining consistency with the new interface.
tests/integration/accounts/lockup/periodic_lockup_test_suite.go (1)
49-49: LGTM: API adaptation for address seed support
The change correctly adapts to the new Init method signature by passing nil for the optional address seed parameter, maintaining the existing test behavior.
x/accounts/README.md (1)
499-524: LGTM: Clear and comprehensive documentation on address derivation
The documentation effectively explains both address derivation methods, their formulas, and provides valuable best practices for using address seeds. The content is well-structured and helps developers understand how to implement deterministic address generation.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
511-511: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
514-514: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
api/cosmos/accounts/v1/tx.pulsar.go (1)
4328-4330: LGTM: Clean protobuf generation for address seed support
The generated code correctly implements the new address_seed field with proper protobuf tags and all necessary methods for field handling.
| _, addr1, err := k.Init(ctx, testAccountType, []byte("sender"), &types.Empty{}, nil, nil) | ||
| require.NoError(t, err) | ||
| _, err = k.Execute(ctx, addr1, []byte("sender"), &types.UInt64Value{Value: 10}, nil) | ||
| require.NoError(t, err) | ||
|
|
||
| // we set counter to 20 | ||
| _, addr2, err := k.Init(ctx, testAccountType, []byte("sender"), &types.Empty{}, nil) | ||
| _, addr2, err := k.Init(ctx, testAccountType, []byte("sender"), &types.Empty{}, nil, nil) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add test cases for address seed persistence
The genesis test should verify that address seeds are correctly persisted and restored during export/import cycles.
Consider adding test cases that:
- Initialize accounts with specific address seeds
- Export genesis
- Import genesis
- Verify address reconstruction
| @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ func initFixture(t *testing.T, f func(ctx context.Context, msg *account_abstract | |||
| banktypes.RegisterMsgServer(router, bankkeeper.NewMsgServerImpl(bankKeeper)) | |||
|
|
|||
| // init account | |||
| _, addr, err := accountsKeeper.Init(integrationApp.Context(), "mock", []byte("system"), &gogotypes.Empty{}, nil) | |||
| _, addr, err := accountsKeeper.Init(integrationApp.Context(), "mock", []byte("system"), &gogotypes.Empty{}, nil, nil) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove redundant nil parameter.
The Init method call includes two nil parameters, which appears to be redundant. One nil parameter should be sufficient for the address_seed.
- _, addr, err := accountsKeeper.Init(integrationApp.Context(), "mock", []byte("system"), &gogotypes.Empty{}, nil, nil)
+ _, addr, err := accountsKeeper.Init(integrationApp.Context(), "mock", []byte("system"), &gogotypes.Empty{}, nil)Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
|
Looks like you need to fix one test: https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/actions/runs/12179043734/job/33970331669?pr=22776 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
tests/integration/accounts/wiring_test.go (1)
Line range hint
1-70: Test coverage assessment: Comprehensive integration testingThe test provides good coverage of component integration:
- Verifies gas consumption before and after operations
- Tests chain ID propagation via header service
- Validates address encoding/decoding
- Confirms correct fund transfers and balance updates
- Includes proper error handling and assertions
However, consider adding test cases for:
- Error scenarios with the new Init parameters
- Edge cases in address generation
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
tests/integration/accounts/wiring_test.go(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
tests/integration/accounts/wiring_test.go (3)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
🔇 Additional comments (1)
tests/integration/accounts/wiring_test.go (1)
31-31: Verify the purpose of new nil parameters
The test passes nil values for the new parameters in Init. Consider adding test cases that exercise these parameters with non-nil values to ensure robust testing of the new address generation functionality.
Let's check how these parameters are used in other test files:
…table address creation (#22776) Co-authored-by: Julien Robert <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit ecd53f8) # Conflicts: # api/cosmos/accounts/v1/tx.pulsar.go # tests/integration/v2/auth/accounts_retro_compatibility_test.go
…table address creation (backport #22776) (#22805) Co-authored-by: testinginprod <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Julien Robert <[email protected]>
Description
Closes: #17516
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.mdReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
address_seedfield for account initialization to enhance address generation.MsgInitmessages.Bug Fixes
ErrAccountAlreadyExiststo improve error handling during account creation.Documentation
Tests